Is It Time to Reform the Unloading of Semi Trailers?

 

Carriers can be held responsible for semi trailer unloading. Given the perceived truck driver shortage, it may be time to change this. Wasting drivers' time should no longer be taken for granted. The 14 hour rule combined with lengthy unload times can limit productivity. It appears that the 14 hour rule is not going anywhere. The solution is to increase operational efficiency and decrease dock time.

 

Back in the day, lumpers would line the streets in front of warehouses. They attempted to get truckers to hire them. The truckers' goal was to find a good lumper at a reasonable price. The carrier might develop a relationship with a good lumper. Sometimes, the relationship was between the consignee and the lumper. You would get a receipt from the lumper. You had no idea if the lumper was who he said he was. Neither did the IRS. That is one of the reasons that the street lumper has given way to organized lumper services.

There is no guarantee of quality service. I remember driving most of the night. I arrived just in time for my 06:00 appointment. The load was loaded late, but got delivered on time. The lumpers did not show up. The consignee called them. They arrived at 06:30 smelling of alcohol. They tried assuring me that they were sober. They told me that they had gone straight home at 02:00 when the bar closed.

 

The consignee gave me 3 choices. I could use the lumpers. This is a good time to remember that as an owner operator I could be held liable in case one of these two goof balls got hurt. I could wait a day for them to sober up and face the downtime plus a late delivery penalty. I could unload it myself. I unloaded it myself.

 

Technically it is illegal for the consignee to coerce drivers into hiring a lumper service. Today there is usually a mutual benefit relationship between the lumper service and the consignee. You pay their prices or you do it yourself. If their prices are exorbitant it doesn't matter. It is rare that they let an outside lumper on the dock. They may give a driver a poorly maintained manual pallet jack. That driver may need to pull pallets weighing over a ton each across a wet reefer floor. That driver is risking injury while the lumpers are given fork lifts.
 

In one case a grocery store chain required proof of $1,000,000.00 in liability insurance to allow truckers on the dock. OOIDA sued and won in that case. Consignees can put up barriers to encourage drivers to use the lumper service. The line between encouragement and coercion is filled with shades of gray.

 

The solution is simple. Transfer the unloading responsibility from the carrier to the shipper. The shipper can use whatever equipment they have to unload the semi trailers. They can use an outside lumper service. Here is what I think would happen. Shippers and consignees would cooperate. Shippers would load semi trailers the way the consignees want it. Overall efficiency would improve and we could all become safer and more productive.

 

Comments (9)

Jeff Clark

Jeff Clark of Kewaunee, WI has been driving a truck for 24 years. He has been an owner operator for 11 years.

Read These Next...

 
 

Thanks for the comments John. I really don't have a problem with the lumper service concept. What we have done is create extra layers. Those extra layer create inefficiency and extra expense. If the burden were placed directly on the consignee to unload the freight, I believe that the system would become more efficient. The consignee would still be free to use contract services. They would just pay them directly instead of going through the driver to the carrier to the shipper and simply have the shipper one way or another pass the cost back on to the consignee.

October 04, 2014 3:40:01 AM

I think its also worth mentioning that why would you unload your truck for pennies vs using a lumper that limits your risk of injury? After all I can use my time better napping and doing paperwork then unloading. Just from a stand point of safety, I think unloading in a unfamiliar place just is asking for trouble. I have worked for carriers who basically specify who the lumper service is and how much to pay them. Those kinds of arrangements are already being used.

October 03, 2014 14:05:21 PM

In general the lumper's I run into have been for food. In general they are tied to a food warehouse and while not employee's. They might as well be. This is really the problem as these people become secondary like kind employee's and in reality they should be considered as such. To me they are not contractors as such. For example I'll bet if you brought in your own lumper to unload your truck and not use the ones at the customer. They might be turned away. I personally don't care to unload and would probably do it much slower then a lumper would so it makes sense to use them. As long as its included in rate I am fine with it. I have trucked 15 years and lumpers have always been a necessary evil that you just deal with.

October 03, 2014 14:00:44 PM

Dan - How do you pay for the lumper service? I recently saw a lumper service that took credit cards. That is more efficient than the "approved" checks. My carrier supplies "approved" checks. When I was in the reefer business, the most that they would pay me was $50 for unloading. I would do the smaller jobs and keep the $50. For about 10 years, I unloaded 3 floor loads of paper per week. More and more, it got to the point that you were forced to use the lumper service at a lot of the stops.

October 03, 2014 4:01:37 AM

I've been dealing with this lumper thing since 1982. I understand how & why it works. I have no problem with it. And yes I pull a reefer & deal with it all the time.

October 02, 2014 21:32:32 PM

Historically it goes further back than that Joey. It was a service that trucking companies provided that the rail road companies did not. It has evolved over the years into this incredibly inefficient system. We can do so much better.

October 02, 2014 9:58:32 AM

Lumpers have never made sense to me. That whole system of unloading trucks is from the 1940s and 50s.

October 02, 2014 9:43:34 AM

I see it more than you do. In the reefer business it is more common than the dry van business, We have gone to more drop and hook in the dry side. That is good. The system of the driver hiring and paying the lumper service is incredibly inefficient. First is the paying by "approved" check. The check processing alone costs over $10. Then the driver must turn over the receipt to the carrier, The carrier then passes it on to the shipper. AND do you really think that the shipper does not know that the consignee is charging to unload? So, the shipper finds a way to include it in the price of the product. It just seems like a lot of processing for no added value.

October 02, 2014 7:49:47 AM

This is a subject I have not dealt with much over the years. When I operated a flat bed trailer we had a few places that made us use a tarping service which drove me crazy in much the same way lumbers can.

October 02, 2014 7:01:44 AM