Today's blog will feature my guest , Jim Bauman . I met Jim on Facebook quite some time ago and he was interested in the Cascadia Evolution . After we discussed my truck's specifications and fuel mileage results, Jim decided to order a clone of my 2013 Cascadia Evolution . I asked Jim if he would like to write about his experience with his new 2014 Cascadia Evolution . I hope you enjoy Jim's story .

We could not be happier with our 2015 Cascadia Evolution. I knew that emissions compliance hurt fuel economy when first required back in 2003, and I wasn't sure that the new, emission compliant engines could match the fuel economy of our old 2002 Freightliner Century. Henry Albert was extremely patient with me, as I  contacted him more than several times, asking about spec's and fuel milage. He was posting numbers in the high 9's and low 10's, but I was somewhat skeptical about his numbers for two reasons: his loads were always relatively lighter than ours (we're used to having 42K lb loads in our trailer), and also, Freightliner provides his truck (no truck payment ever!) where Henry in exchange presents his experience and facts about the truck and how it performs to potential customers like me . Nothing against Henry; I very much like and respect him, but after all, I could see someone in his position having a potential to tweak the numbers to make the Cascadia appear more favorable! I was shocked to realize that the last ten fuel-ups with our new Evolution yielded an average of 9.05mpg! Every one of the loads had between 22,000 lbs in the  trailer and 32,000 (GVW between 58,000 and 68,000 lbs), and a cruise speed of 63mph. Even with heavy 42K lb loads going into the trailer (gross 78K lbs), the truck consistently obtains around 8.46 mpg. Our old 2002 Century couldn't touch these excellent numbers; so the new Evolution not only matched our old Century's economy, it is doing considerably better! To this day, I'm still delighted and almost shocked.

Excellent fuel economy is the top reason I love this new tractor, since this allows us to convert more of  our gross pay to net pay.  The second noticeable improvement is the quietness. Diesel clatter and turbo whine very very noticeable in our old tractor, and both are noticeably absent in this new Cascadia. I think this will help protect my hearing; a quieter running truck also means the radio doesn't have to be turned up high to overcome ambient noise. It might seem strange to rank "quietness" so high on the list, but when we're in a truck for so long, this factor makes a huge difference in improving quality of life behind the wheel.

Another awesome feature is the Park Smart (battery powered A/C and diesel fired heater). We were delayed in Houston, Tx for over 10 hours, when it was 95 degrees outside. Surprisingly, the Park Smart kept us cool the whole ten hours, without having to idle. What allows such a long duration is the four extra AGM batteries, and the extreme insulation package; even the sleeper curtain is insulated, like a flannel shirt, but much thicker. With our old Century, the passenger side floor would get extremely hot, due to the exhaust pipe underneath it. This is not the case with this Cascadia; the floor remains cool, even during a hard pull during the summer. 

The  DT12 automated, direct drive transmission is yet another positive impression. I had driven some automated transmissions previously, and I did not like the way they shifted; even with a light load, they would run the engine rpm's very high before shifting to a higher gear, which is not good for fuel economy. This DT12 is nothing like the automated transmissions of yesterday; it is incredibly sophisticated. Under light loads, the shift points occur at much lower rpms; and if possible, the transmission will even skip gears, which further increases fuel economy. Part of what helps this Evolution's fuel economy is the "E-coast" function of the DT12. With E coast, the transmission will effectively go into "neutral" while going down gentle grades, which means you'll coast much further.   I was surprised that in certain areas, I would literally coast for over a mile, all the while the engine is just idling at 600 rpm!

The last feature I'll mention is that the truck is a 6X2, meaning that only one of the tandem axles is powered. Therefore, 6X2's have no power divider, nor do they have any gears in the other tandem axle; this results in greater efficiency. In talking with Henry Albert, who obtains remarkable fuel milage with his 6X2 Evolution, I was convinced to do the same. I believe that 6X2's save about .3mpg over 6X4's, half of this coming from the eliminated gears, and the other half coming from the fact that now one can use trailer tires on the non-drive "tag" axle. Trailer tires have far less rolling resistance than driver tires, or even steer tires. I was worried about the traction of 6X2, since now we have only one powered axle. When we first took delivery of our new Evolution 6X2 this past March, we had a trip from Charlotte, NC to Seattle, Wa. On I-90, there is a steep grade going west as you cross from Idaho into Montana. There had been a snowstorm that caught the DOT off guard, where the grade was not plowed or treated with chemicals, nor was the "chain-up" sign turned on. Several 6X4's had gotten stuck, and we were able to make it almost to the top, but another truck in front of us got stuck and blocked the roads. Soon the plows came by, and I was able to get going again merely by chaining the outer wheels of our live axle. I was pleased that, after all, our 6X2 performed as well as 6X4's; better yet, passed several 6X4's already stuck. To be fair, we had a heavy load, where this weight over the drive axle is a definite advantage. Bottom line, the 6X2 is not nearly as disadvantaged as I thought it might be in such  conditions. Keep in mind that our 6X2 has a locking differential, as well as a suspension system that automatically dumps air from the non-powerd axle when wheel spin is detected via ABS system. This allows more weight to be transferred to the live axle; yielding improved traction. One difference between our 6X2 and Henry's, we have dual fuel efficient tires, where Henry has wide single efficient tires. As dual tires have become almost as efficient as wide singles (due to competition), I feel that the extra traction they provide is reassuring, particularly on a 6X2's drive axle, especially when there is no longer an noticeable fuel efficiency difference.

If anyone would like to contact me with questions about our 6X2 Evolution, call me at 704-918-7759. I get zero perks from Freightliner to provide this feedback, but I'm so happy with ours that I'd love to help other potential buyers, as I know how much stress spec'ing a truck can be; you want to get it perfect!
 
-Jim Bauman

Comments (13)

Henry Albert

Henry Albert is the owner of Albert Transport, Inc., based in Statesville, NC. Before participating in the "Slice of Life" program, Albert drove a 2001 Freightliner Century Class S/Tâ„¢, and will use his Cascadia for general freight and a dry van trailer. Albert, who has been a trucker since 1983, was recognized by Overdrive as its 2007 Trucker of the Year.

Read These Next...

TRUCK Smart

Know Your Truck

June 24, 2018

TRUCK Smart

FREIGHT DAMAGE oh noooo

June 20, 2016

TRUCK Smart

 
 

Thanks for all the great comments and questions . I wish Jim continued success and look forward to following his progress as he racks up the miles on his new ride .

July 28, 2014 8:32:06 AM

Thanks Jim for all the specifics! I can see that the dealer ordered this truck with down the road resale in mind to appeal to local Canada only heavy haulers instead of specing to a pure fuel econo cross border hauler. The slower rear ends and higher hp are typically indicative of this. Also, due to bureaucratic misunderstandings with lawmakers, the 6x2 configuration is not legal in Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia as of this time. I'm going to try moving the fuel tanks back a few inches to try and unload the front axle and close the trailer gap, I'll update on how that goes once I get it done. Also going to try to have the engine derated to 455 for a period of a month or so and see how the fuel econo tracks. Looks forward to hearing more how you continue to do, Jim. Thanks!

July 28, 2014 7:31:18 AM

Notice I've added an extra section to the trailer skirts. They come as a set of 3 panels per side; the extra one allows almost no gap when trailer tandems are in the "California" position. These skirts are only 7" above the ground too. I've ordered a set of wheel covers for the trailer..... it's always good to keep improving aerodynamics.

July 28, 2014 6:21:13 AM

Jeff, I feel that Henry convincing me to try 6X2 gives us .3mpg. I've talked with some fleets that have tested and compared 6X2, and they agree. You get about .15 mpg savings from having no power divider gears or rear differential gears turning; and you get another .15mpg from using trailer tires on the tag axle. Trailer tires have only 75% of the rolling resistance of even fuel efficient drive tires! Thanks for comments.

July 28, 2014 6:15:22 AM

Darren, we have a 226" wheelbase. When I ordered this truck, I based the wheelbase on our old Century, which also had 226". However, I noticed that I had to keep the 5th wheel about 4" back compared to our old truck, due to mandatory emission components, etc making newer trucks heavier at the front. So we too have about a 26" gap. That's the one thing I would change; I would order a 222" or 224" wheelbase, provided that I will still have enough clearance between the ParkSmart condenser bolted to the rear of the tractor and a potential refrigeration unit if I pull such trailers. At some point, one has to keep in mind the bridge law limits; if you have too short a wheelbase, you can't have the trailer tires all the way forward, or you'll have too much weight in too short of distance. I think 222" would be ok, I know 224" would for sure, as many fleets are spec'ing 224". At least you know that a gap of 26" is where we're at, and still getting great fuel milage. We do have a 13K front axle capacity, but I have our 5th wheel set to only load 12K on the steers; I think this is easier on our roads at 6K per steer tire (tandems with 34K load divided by 8 tires = only 4,250 lbs / tire.... same for trailer).

July 28, 2014 6:08:20 AM

Darren, I agree with Jeff about the trailer affecting fuel milage. I believe that our skirts give us .3mpg (Schneider actually put out a PSA that shows same gains with skirts). The tail gave us about .2mpg. So, right there we have about .5mpg gain vs a trailer without skirts and tail. Tires can easily swing fuel milage .5mpg (or more) between low RR tires such as our Bridgestone Ecopia's or Michelin's Energy tires vs something like a Bridgestone M726EL. Our truck is direct drive D12 transmission / 2.50 rears, which gives us a cruise rpm of 1325 at 63mph; if you have 2.62 rears, I'd drive slow enough to keep the rpm at 1325 or less; since you say you usually run 60, I see you're already keeping rpm's in the sweet spot. I also try to limit my turbo boost to 20psi when accelerating or going up hills, as long as I'm not in anyone's way. If I see a hill approaching, I usually accelerate with 5 lbs boost to gain momentum before the hill, and then allow the boost to climb to 20 at the most, if needed at all. Bottom line, if your trailers have no skirt or tails, and have high RR recaps, your trailers alone could be costing you about 1mpg.

July 28, 2014 5:54:20 AM

I agree with all the good Comments, my baby is still making me proud of her.i scaled up from my 2007 Volvo 780 which I love to. To my 2015 Cascadia.

July 27, 2014 22:40:37 PM

455hp, you could probably set yours to 455. 13,000 lb axle and higher rated tires helped me close the gap. I talked my company into skirts. It is hard to tell a lot from one tank. I do run mostly upper Midwest, so I don't pull your hills.

July 27, 2014 20:34:42 PM

Jeff, unfortunately the trailer issue is one that I cannot affect. We have newer trailers with side skirts coming online as soon as they are delivered, so I have to deal with the older ones as well. That said, this last trip from Hartland, NB to Fogelsville, PA (680 miles with 41760 lbs), deadhead 72 miles to Morristown, NJ and load 42240 lbs for Brampton, ON (463 miles) on our newest skirted reefer yielded me 7.2 MPG. I run tire pressure at 105 psi and tires are fairly new with alignment done about a month ago. Idle time is sitting at 5%. I'll have to pull DDEC report next dealer visit. One thing that bothers me is the trailer gap at 26in from end of rubber extender to from of trailer. I'd close that gap more, but with these heavy loads I would be 12780 on steer axle, way over 12350 rating. Is your engine rated at 505hp? Also do you have the same 2.62 rear ratio? Thanks

July 27, 2014 19:58:30 PM

Darren my first thought is your trailers. I know that for me when I run a non skirted trailer my fuel mileage goes down. Now, PTI has skirted almost all of our road trailers. Jim and Henry also have trailer tails. Do you have idle time? tires? alignment? Do you run north south or east west? There are a ton of factors that determine fuel mileage. Someone should examine your DDEC report. One of the things that we do a very poor job of as an OEM and as an industry is communicating how to work with the new technology.

July 27, 2014 4:42:42 AM

Thanks Jim for the update. Those are some impressive numbers!

July 26, 2014 18:11:06 PM

Great update! Jeff your truck sounds spec'd similar to mine. I run at 60 mph and vast majority of my load weights come in around 78k gross occasionally more when I'm in Canada. 7.34 is my running average. Any thoughts or suggestions guys?

July 26, 2014 12:25:08 PM

Your numbers are a little better than mine. I am running a 6x4 with higher rolling resistance tires and no trailer tire. Mine has been averaging 8.665. I did just have back to back 9+ MPG tanks. Most of my loads are over 40,000 pounds and I have been averaging about 8.5 mpg even with those loads. Most of my tanks have 3 loads on them. My recent "low" tank was 8.16 mpg with 3 loads 39.930 was my light load. The others were 43,994 and 45.554. I did have about 176 dead head miles mixed in with those loads. GLAD that your truck is working out for you.

July 26, 2014 8:56:01 AM