I have received many questions from drivers about the 4th Amendment and if it protects from a private security guard search. The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stops the government from searching and seizing your property without probable cause. If the government wants to conduct a search, a warrant can be issued specific to the items to be searched as well as their location, and what may be seized.  There are several exceptions that allow a warrant-less search (stop and frisk, search incident to a lawful arrest, plain view doctrine, hot pursuit, automobile, and consent.)
 
Anyone who is acting on behalf of and under the guidance of the government becomes an agent of the government and as such is covered by the 4th Amendment.  The government can’t have someone do something for them they could not do for themselves.  This prevents the government from abusing your rights.
 
So, does this Amendment cover security guards that do not act for or under the guidance of the government?  No. Security guards are not prevented by the 4th Amendment from entering your truck on their employer’s property.
 
When entering someone’s property, like a warehouse dock, you become an invitee and the property owner has certain responsibilities to its guests.  One is to protect guests from known dangers on the property.  Employers have the obligation to protect their employees while they are at work.  An employer can protect their employees by limiting entry of weapons or drugs on the property.  A notice should be posted that weapons and drugs are not allowed on the property and all vehicles and/or persons on the property are subject to searches.  Yes, they can do that. When notified of a possible search and you enter the property willingly, you are agreeing to the possibility of a search.
 
However, without a visible notice posted by the shipper and the opportunity to decline a search before entering the property, you could reasonably file a police report for trespass against the guard.
 
The difference between the government and private security guards is that the government can force a search, the security guards cannot.  The security guard can’t put you in jail or give you a fine for failing to allow them to search you or your truck.  They can deny entrance onto the property if you deny permission for the search.

Comments (5)

Jim Klepper

Jim Klepper is a nationally-recognized transportation attorney and trucking industry advocate. His national law firm is entirely dedicated to trucking defense, and has defended over 260,000 CDL drivers and carriers since the advent of the CDL. He is personally licensed to practice law in 16 states, including the United States Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court. A prominent author and speaker, Jim regularly writes legal advice columns for truckers in industry trade journals, and is a featured advisor on national radio shows. He serves on the Board of Directors of the Truckload Carriers Association, the American Trucking Association, the Arkansas Trucking Association, the Oklahoma Trucking Association and the Oklahoma Humane Society. Mr. Klepper is active in many charities and trucking industry initiatives, and is also a Licensed Pharmacist.

Read These Next...

TRUCK Smart

TRUCK Smart

 
 

Jim... I'd love to see an in depth article on Law Enforcement's Search and Seizure's rules with respect to CMV's. Many LEO's think they have a right to search our trucks at will and this is not so.. Their rights to search are limited by the scope of a CMV safety inspection without Probable Cause and I think drivers need to undertand the difference.

July 12, 2013 1:11:19 AM

I have never been searched or asked to search by a private security guard. I am not sure how I would react. There is nothing in my truck that is illegal. But, I truly hate the idea of someone searching my private property.

May 20, 2013 19:15:40 PM

Very interesting article Jim. It helps clarify the difference between law enforcement/ government and private security guards as well as clarifying property owners rights.
Thank you.

April 27, 2013 21:35:54 PM

Interesting.

April 26, 2013 9:02:04 AM

This is interesting material Jim -- thanks for clarifying.

April 25, 2013 11:13:57 AM